<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Reason with Passion</title>
	<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com</link>
	<description>Reason, free from passion, is dead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:41:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Words of a Prophet</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;When you enlist to serve the Lord Jesus Christ, you leave neutral ground forever and you can never get back to it. If you leave the Church of God, it can only be at the instigation of the evil one, and you will submit to him, and you will come to hate me and the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/06/20/165/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Prophet or Madman?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it’s a very dramatic title, I know.  I borrowed the theme from an article written by Elder Bruce R. McConkie back in 1979 which he entitled “The Story of a Prophet’s Madness.”  The intrigue of the title is only eclipsed by the actual story, which I find particularly á propos in light of recent [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/05/03/prophet-or-madman/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Three Pillars</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is in response to some thought-provoking questions/comments posted by Mary regarding the translation of “The Three Pillars of Economics” on the Higher Law blog.  I’m not trying to speak for the author of the blog, but I think Mary raises some interesting questions and makes some important observations.  Since I’m never at a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/02/15/three-pillars/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who has the devil?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m kind of astonished about this phenomenon—more like an epidemic maybe—taking place among the critics of the Higher Law. Take this one for example from “Mary’s Friend:” If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks, do we really need to pray about it? That same sentiment is followed up by “Sean:” [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/02/14/who-has-the-devil/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>No &#8220;Good&#8221; without God</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I was catching up on some comments that have been posted on the Higher Law blog today and came across this particular one (#2) that made a statement that I’ve heard many times over the years.  I’ve often thought to write a bit about this idea in general, so I figure this specific instance is [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/02/10/no-good-without-god/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Samuel and Nephi</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Samuel and Nephi My daily Book of Mormon reading is currently in the book of Helaman.  This morning I was effectively slapped in the face by one of the most obvious examples we have in scripture illustrating the difference between prophets who are called and given the gift of prophecy for the delivering of important [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/01/27/samuel-and-nephi/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why Not?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been following a blog called The Higher Law recently.  There has been much commentary on it by members of the LDS church regarding the intent of the blog and the movement behind it, and specifically regarding the author.  Their contention is that the kind of revelatory direction claimed by the author, if it were [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/01/26/why-not/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Challenge?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so obviously I never posted the challenge.  I have my reasons for that, believe whatever you want.  Someday I might revisit it when it&#8217;s time. &#8216;Nuff said.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2010/01/26/the-challenge-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hold your horses&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, I know.  It&#8217;s coming. (I gotta make a living at some point, eh?)]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2009/08/11/hold-your-horses/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Challenge</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to a challenge issued by my friend*, Craig, as part of our extended discussion at conservativefront.com, I&#8217;m working on a scientifically reproduceable process that any person can go through to prove that God exists.  I guarantee that it works. I had expected to have it ready by now, but I&#8217;ve decided to go [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.reasonwithpassion.com/2009/07/31/the-challenge/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

